This has a footnote.1

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

# This has an anchor
"Science is a way of thinking more than it is a body of knowledge," said Carl Sagan.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


Footnotes
1 This of course is not the only reason. In other cases, there are other reasons that have little to do with the tools we use. Speech often has political purposes, and those people are not motivated to show their process or imply that they may have more to learn. This is a separate problem. It's important, but it won't be solved by just offering them better tools. It requires a cultural change, and I'm not sure how to go about that quite. I do think an important first step is making it possible for those who do want to be able to share their process and open up their ideas for improvement. You have to make it possible for motivated people to do before you can try to change the average approach.